![\"Luljeta](\"http:\/\/www.shkoder.net\/images\/fjala\/2010\/luljeta_lleshanaku.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Elsa Demo<\/strong>, 15.02.2010<\/p>\n “Child of nature” \u00ebsht\u00eb libri i dyt\u00eb i Luljeta Lleshanakut q\u00eb botohet n\u00eb Amerik\u00eb. Nj\u00eb bised\u00eb p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtjet e p\u00ebrkthimit, p\u00ebrballjen n\u00eb nj\u00eb kulture tjet\u00ebr, p\u00ebr modelet njer\u00ebzor\u00eb n\u00eb poezin\u00eb e saj, p\u00ebr \u00e7mimet komb\u00ebtare t\u00eb let\u00ebrsis\u00eb dhe gjendjen ku ndodhen krijuesit shqiptar\u00eb<\/p>\n “Child of nature” \u00ebsht\u00eb libri i dyt\u00eb poetik i Luljeta Lleshanakut q\u00eb botohet pas “Fresco”-s n\u00eb Amerik\u00eb, nga e nj\u00ebjta sht\u00ebpi botuese, New Directions. Autorja \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer nga SHBA ku pati dy lexime t\u00eb “F\u00ebmija e natyr\u00ebs” n\u00eb fund t\u00eb janarit, nj\u00eb n\u00eb Nju Jork dhe tjetri n\u00eb Las Vegas, ku Lleshanaku po ndjek studimet n\u00eb Black Mountain Institute.<\/p>\n Ajo pohon se tek “F\u00ebmij\u00ebt e natyr\u00ebs” 2006, \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekur t\u00eb risjell\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb personale t\u00eb modeleve njer\u00ebzore q\u00eb kan\u00eb ndikuar n\u00eb formimin e saj. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kuptim poezia e saj \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb l\u00ebnd\u00eb e pasur jet\u00ebsore q\u00eb p\u00ebrpunohet nga mjete t\u00eb nj\u00eb intuite akoma jo e n\u00ebnshtruar nga dija dhe kultura.<\/p>\n “Lleshanaku nuk jeton n\u00eb t\u00eb shkuar\u00ebn e ashp\u00ebr dhe klim\u00ebn brutale e f\u00ebmij\u00ebris\u00eb. P\u00ebrkundrazi, ajo i thur lavde larmive t\u00eb p\u00ebrvojave t\u00eb reja, duke mbushur vjershat e saj me nj\u00eb figuracion t\u00eb fuqish\u00ebm dhe vizione t\u00eb befasueshme.<\/p>\n Kjo nuk do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se ajo e shp\u00ebrfill bot\u00ebn e sh\u00ebmtuar jasht\u00eb der\u00ebs s\u00eb vet; ajo e tejkalon at\u00eb dhe e transformon n\u00eb imazhe universale t\u00eb s\u00eb bukur\u00ebs, t\u00eb s\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebs dhe t\u00eb shpres\u00ebs.”, thuhet n\u00eb pasth\u00ebnien e botimit anglisht.<\/p>\n Me k\u00ebt\u00eb rast biseda me Lleshanakun shtyhet edhe n\u00eb temat e dit\u00ebs p\u00ebr let\u00ebrsin\u00eb, \u00e7mimet komb\u00ebtare, gjendjen e prodhimit dhe gjykimit t\u00eb krijimtaris\u00eb.<\/p>\n Cila \u00ebsht\u00eb historia e botimit anglisht t\u00eb k\u00ebtij libri?<\/strong><\/p>\n Libri i cili sapo u promovua ne Shtetet e Bashkuara quhet “Child of nature” (“F\u00ebmija i natyr\u00ebs” ne shqip), nj\u00eb p\u00ebrkthim i v\u00ebllimit tim “F\u00ebmij\u00ebt e natyr\u00ebs” i botuar n\u00eb shqip n\u00eb 2006 dhe i nj\u00eb grupi poezish t\u00eb reja, t\u00eb cilat i kam shkruar gjat\u00eb dy viteve t\u00eb fundit.<\/p>\n Libri botohet nga i nj\u00ebjti botues, i cili botoi edhe v\u00ebllimin tim t\u00eb par\u00eb “Fresco”. N\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb, t\u00eb gjasht\u00ebdhjet\u00eb poezit\u00eb e librit, jan\u00eb tashm\u00eb t\u00eb botuara n\u00eb revistat amerikane gjat\u00eb viteve t\u00eb fundit; m\u00eb e fundit \u00ebsht\u00eb revista “American poetry review”, e cila do t\u00eb botoj\u00eb s\u00eb shpejti poem\u00ebn “E h\u00ebna n\u00eb shtat\u00eb dit\u00eb”.<\/p>\n K\u00ebshtuq\u00eb, e kisha kaluar nj\u00eblloj testi para se botuesi t\u00eb vendoste p\u00ebr librin e dyt\u00eb. Por gjithsesi, duke pasur parasysh kriz\u00ebn ekonomike n\u00eb SHBA, r\u00ebnien drastike t\u00eb numrit t\u00eb botimeve deri n\u00eb falimentim t\u00eb botuesve, druhesha se ishte momenti i gabuar p\u00ebr aplikim, ose s\u00eb paku, e dija se zgjedhja do t\u00eb ishte shum\u00eb selektive. Megjithat\u00eb, n\u00ebse libri do t\u00eb refuzohej, nuk kisha nd\u00ebrmend t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoja ndonj\u00eb botues tjet\u00ebr. Refuzimi do t\u00eb ishte nj\u00eb shenj\u00eb q\u00eb botuesi priste di\u00e7ka m\u00eb cil\u00ebsore prej meje.<\/p>\n Por si\u00e7 u pa, gj\u00ebrat shkuan mir\u00eb dhe n\u00eb fund t\u00eb janarit libri u promovua n\u00eb Las Vegas nga Black Mountain Institute dhe n\u00eb New York City.<\/p>\n Nj\u00eb nga gj\u00ebrat q\u00eb m\u00eb b\u00ebn t\u00eb ndjehem mir\u00eb me k\u00ebt\u00eb lib\u00ebr nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb botim tjet\u00ebr amerikan, por nj\u00eb botim tjet\u00ebr nga Ne\u00eb Directions, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb nga botuesit m\u00eb t\u00eb njohur, me nj\u00eb tradit\u00eb shum\u00eb t\u00eb respektuar botimesh, duke filluar nga Ezra Pound dhe William Carlos Williams e deri tek Neruda, Bei Dao, Eliot Weinberger, Octavio Paz, Michael Palmer, Denise Levertov, etj.<\/p>\n Me \u00e7far\u00eb v\u00ebshtir\u00ebsish ndeshet nj\u00eb poet gjat\u00eb p\u00ebrkthimit n\u00eb nj\u00eb “gjuh\u00eb t\u00eb madhe” si anglishtja? Nd\u00ebrsa libri i dyt\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb bashk\u00ebpunim midis dy p\u00ebrkthyesish: nga shqipja n\u00eb anglisht \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrkthyer nga Shpresa Qatipi (pedagoge n\u00eb Universitetin e Tiran\u00ebs) dhe nga Henry Israeli, i cili le t\u00eb themi q\u00eb b\u00ebn redaktimin poetik n\u00eb Anglisht, duke u bazuar n\u00eb p\u00ebrkthimin literal (ose fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr fjal\u00eb).<\/p>\n Duket pak e \u00e7uditshme, por \u00ebsht\u00eb zgjidhja e vetme n\u00eb kushtet kur \u00ebsht\u00eb e pamundur t\u00eb gjendet nj\u00eb p\u00ebrkthyes q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb anglishtfol\u00ebs i lindur, i cili t\u00eb njoh\u00eb shqipen po kaq mir\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn koh\u00eb. N\u00eb leximin n\u00eb New York fjala vjen, kishte edhe shqiptar\u00eb, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt i d\u00ebgjuan t\u00eb dy variantet, dhe m\u00eb dhan\u00eb t\u00eb kuptoj se p\u00ebrkthimi \u00ebsht\u00eb mjaft i mir\u00eb. Megjithat\u00eb un\u00eb besoj se n\u00eb t\u00eb ardhmen, nuk do t\u00eb jet\u00eb kaq problem, pasi nj\u00eb brez i ri student\u00ebsh t\u00eb cil\u00ebt jan\u00eb larguar pas ’90-\u00ebs, do t\u00eb jen\u00eb pik\u00ebrisht ata q\u00eb do t\u00eb jen\u00eb p\u00ebrkthyesit e ardhsh\u00ebm t\u00eb let\u00ebrsis\u00eb shqipe.<\/p>\n Fjala vjen, m\u00eb b\u00ebri p\u00ebrshtypje shum\u00eb t\u00eb mir\u00eb Ani Gjika e cila erdhi n\u00eb leximin tim nga Bostoni, nj\u00eb poete e rritur atje, q\u00eb studionte p\u00ebr master n\u00eb nj\u00eb universitet amerikan, e cila kishte zgjedhur poezin\u00eb shqipe t\u00eb shkruar nga grat\u00eb, si tem\u00eb diplome. Shum\u00eb inteligjente, ambicioze dhe e vet\u00ebdijshme p\u00ebr kultur\u00ebn nga vjen.<\/p>\n Cilat jan\u00eb sfidat e p\u00ebrballjes me nj\u00eb kultur\u00eb tjet\u00ebr?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00cbsht\u00eb nj\u00eb pyetje me vend, sepse n\u00eb nj\u00eb far\u00eb m\u00ebnyre, kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb edhe dometh\u00ebnia e k\u00ebtij botimi. Nj\u00eb botim n\u00eb SHBA do t\u00eb thot\u00eb konkurrenc\u00eb brenda nj\u00eb kulture treqind milion\u00ebshe. Kemi t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb me nj\u00eb shtet multikulturor, i cili nuk kuptohet ndryshe vet\u00ebm si sintez\u00eb kulturash.<\/p>\n Madje edhe mjesht\u00ebrit e let\u00ebrsis\u00eb s\u00eb Europ\u00ebs Lindore, i kam lexuar n\u00eb botimin e tyre n\u00eb Anglisht. Flas p\u00ebr Mendelshtamin, Herbertin, Ricosin, Shimborsk\u00ebn, Ahmatov\u00ebn, Pasternakun. At\u00ebher\u00eb shtrohet pyetja se \u00e7far\u00eb mund t\u00eb ofrosh t\u00eb re ose ndryshe p\u00ebr nj\u00eb kultur\u00eb t\u00eb mbingopur t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj natyre?<\/p>\n Ose si mundet t\u00eb p\u00ebrball\u00ebsh me sukses k\u00ebt\u00eb sfid\u00eb p\u00ebrball\u00eb nj\u00eb audience q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb kaq e informuar. Dhe ta mendosh pastaj q\u00eb vet\u00ebm 4% nga let\u00ebrsia e huaj, p\u00ebrkthehet n\u00eb Amerik\u00eb. Audienca k\u00ebrkon nj\u00eb mesazh, ide t\u00eb qarta, t\u00eb cilat arrijn\u00eb t\u00eb kap\u00ebrcejn\u00eb eksperienc\u00ebn individuale. Shkurt, ne nuk mund t\u00eb habisim m\u00eb lexuesin per\u00ebndimor me historin\u00eb ton\u00eb; natyrisht q\u00eb ajo ka pesh\u00ebn e vet, por, vet\u00ebm kur p\u00ebrmes saj zbulohet nj\u00eb ide origjinale, e cila p\u00ebrputhet me konkluzionet e njeriut n\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb bot\u00ebn. Arti \u00ebsht\u00eb konkurrenc\u00eb idesh, jo eksperiencash ose impresionesh.<\/p>\n Nga ana tjet\u00ebr, duke qen\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb kontakt intensiv me let\u00ebrsin\u00eb amerikane, jam p\u00ebrpjekur q\u00eb mos t\u00eb asimilohem nga shijet apo preferencat e mia. N\u00eb prezantimin tim t\u00eb fundit thash\u00eb: po m\u00ebsoj shum\u00eb nga let\u00ebrsia angleze dhe amerikane, por kur shkruaj, p\u00ebrpiqem t\u00eb shkruaj si shqiptare. \u00cbsht\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje personaliteti, t\u00eb cilin pa e kuptuar e reflektojm\u00eb duksh\u00ebm edhe n\u00eb gj\u00ebrat q\u00eb shkruajm\u00eb.<\/p>\n Duke e rilexuar sot k\u00ebt\u00eb lib\u00ebr t\u00eb vijn\u00eb t\u00eb gjalla portretet e prind\u00ebve, burrat dhe grat\u00eb, sht\u00ebpit\u00eb dhe komunitetet e vogla q\u00eb mbanin bashk\u00eb njer\u00ebzit. Nj\u00eb koment p\u00ebr “t\u00eb af\u00ebrmin” q\u00eb z\u00eb kaq vend n\u00eb poezin\u00eb t\u00ebnde.<\/p>\n Shkrimtari, p\u00ebr mendimin tim, nuk mund t\u00eb shpik\u00eb nj\u00eb realitet tjet\u00ebr me imagjinat\u00eb, sepse do t\u00eb d\u00ebshtoj\u00eb. Jam p\u00ebrpjekur pik\u00ebrisht t\u00eb risillja n\u00eb poezi at\u00eb q\u00eb un\u00eb njoh, p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebn time. Dhe nuk ka realitete artistik\u00eb dhe realitete banal\u00eb.<\/p>\n \u00c7do gj\u00eb mund t\u00eb konvertohet n\u00eb art, duke nxjerr\u00eb idet\u00eb, mesazhin, rregullat-nervin q\u00eb na mban t\u00eb lidhur me t\u00eb shkuar\u00ebn dhe t\u00eb ardhmen, po aq sa edhe m\u00eb njer\u00ebzit dhe shoq\u00ebrit\u00eb paralele. Dhe “F\u00ebmij\u00ebt e natyr\u00ebs” t\u00eb cilit ju po i referoheni konkretisht, \u00ebsht\u00eb tamam nj\u00eb gj\u00eb e p\u00ebraf\u00ebrt: risjellje e gjith\u00eb karaktereve t\u00eb cil\u00ebt kan\u00eb ndikuar duksh\u00ebm n\u00eb formimin tim.<\/p>\n Por q\u00ebllimi nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb ky; q\u00ebllimi \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb treguar gjith\u00eb at\u00eb vitalitet njer\u00ebzor q\u00eb ka ky popull, t\u00eb d\u00ebshmuar brenda nj\u00eb periudhe t\u00eb gjat\u00eb izolimi, kur nuk kishte mbetur asnj\u00eb pik\u00eb referimi p\u00ebr t’u mbajtur ose ngush\u00eblluar (as fe, as e nes\u00ebrme), i cili e gjente motivimin vet\u00ebm n\u00eb dinjitetin njer\u00ebzor.<\/p>\n T\u00eb mbetesh njeri i mir\u00eb, t\u00eb mos thyhesh, t\u00eb rezistosh, vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr hir t\u00eb dinjitetit njer\u00ebzor-nj\u00eb test i v\u00ebshtir\u00eb p\u00ebr t’u p\u00ebrballur por shum\u00eb kuptimplot\u00eb. Un\u00eb besoj se lexuesi n\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb bot\u00ebn frym\u00ebzimin e k\u00ebrkon n\u00eb modelin njer\u00ebzor, n\u00eb gjith\u00eb at\u00eb forc\u00eb q\u00eb fshihet brenda njeriut, e q\u00eb shfaqet n\u00eb disa situate t\u00eb caktuara. N\u00eb nj\u00eb rrafsh m\u00eb t\u00eb gj\u00ebr\u00eb, secili nga karakteret p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebson nj\u00eb aspekt t\u00eb jet\u00ebs njer\u00ebzore: lindja, vdekja, martesa, dashuria, mbijetesa, ndarja, etj.<\/p>\n N\u00eb k\u00ebto poezi ka nj\u00eb f\u00ebmij\u00eb v\u00ebzhgues, nj\u00eb f\u00ebmij\u00eb q\u00eb rritet, nj\u00eb vajz\u00eb q\u00eb b\u00ebhet grua. Si do ta p\u00ebrkufizoje ndryshe k\u00ebt\u00eb personazh t\u00ebndin introvert?<\/p>\n E gjith\u00eb poezia \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb metamorfoz\u00eb, nj\u00eb kthim n\u00eb gjenez\u00eb, jo n\u00eb kuptimin kohor, por n\u00eb kuptimin metafizik-si nj\u00eb kthim n\u00eb formulat baz\u00eb q\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb modelet e sjelljes njer\u00ebzore.<\/p>\n Duket sikur nuk ka mbetur m\u00eb asgj\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb shkruar, pasi qoft\u00eb edhe vet\u00ebm mitologjia klasike, i ka ezauruar gjith\u00eb modelet e sjelljes dhe ka krijuar sistemin e tyre t\u00eb klisheve. Por, sidoqoft\u00eb, k\u00ebt\u00eb ofron arti: nj\u00eb riformulim t\u00eb asaj q\u00eb ne tashm\u00eb e njohim, duke iu referuar p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs son\u00eb personale. Ose le t\u00eb themi, nj\u00eb konfirmim i vazhduesh\u00ebm i historis\u00eb dhe kodit t\u00eb sjelljes njer\u00ebzore.<\/p>\n E kthimi i her\u00ebpashersh\u00ebm n\u00eb f\u00ebmij\u00ebri, q\u00eb sa vjen dhe b\u00ebhet m\u00eb i duksh\u00ebm, \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekje p\u00ebr t\u00eb sjell\u00eb t\u00eb past\u00ebr form\u00ebn e par\u00eb t\u00eb perceptimit t\u00eb bot\u00ebs, t\u00eb pandikuar nga shtresat e p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs apo edukimit. \u00cbsht\u00eb vler\u00ebsimi n\u00eb shikim t\u00eb par\u00eb, i cili edhe pse intuitiv, me sa duket \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb i sakti. Dhe n\u00eb art intuita nganj\u00ebher\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb pothuajse gjith\u00e7ka.<\/p>\n N\u00eb janar u mbyll procesi i vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb let\u00ebrsis\u00eb shqipe i nj\u00eb viti t\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00eb. Ministria e Kultur\u00ebs dha \u00e7mimet. Keni ndonj\u00eb koment mbi k\u00ebt\u00eb situat\u00eb q\u00eb i p\u00ebrket krijimit dhe gjykimit?<\/p>\n Prej vitesh, \u00ebsht\u00eb krijuar nj\u00eb precedent shum\u00eb i d\u00ebmsh\u00ebm i modelit t\u00eb jurive letrare: nga pes\u00eb an\u00ebtar\u00eb, vet\u00ebm dy prej tyre jan\u00eb shkrimtar\u00eb. Prej vitesh, jurit\u00eb letrare drejtohen nga t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebt njer\u00ebz, q\u00eb ose jan\u00eb p\u00ebrkthyes, ose i p\u00ebrkasin bot\u00ebs akademike. Nuk e di se ku e kan\u00eb gjetur k\u00ebt\u00eb model kaq cinik dhe fyes.<\/p>\n Si mundet nj\u00eb p\u00ebrkthyes apo nj\u00eb pedagog (qoft\u00eb edhe i let\u00ebrsis\u00eb) t\u00eb gjykoj\u00eb shkrimtarin pa pasur asnj\u00eb kontribut personal si shkrimtar, pa dh\u00ebn\u00eb as edhe nj\u00eb prov\u00eb letrare? Si mundet t’i besohet nj\u00eb gjykimi t\u00eb till\u00eb?<\/p>\n N\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb bot\u00ebn jurit\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsohen nga prozator\u00eb shum\u00eb t\u00eb suksessh\u00ebm kur gjykohet proza, dhe poet\u00eb, kur gjykohet poezia. Kaq, dhe gjykimi \u00ebsht\u00eb i padiskutuesh\u00ebm! N\u00ebse flitet p\u00ebr kritik\u00eb, at\u00ebher\u00eb un\u00eb do t\u00eb mbetem n\u00eb pohimin e po k\u00ebtyre individ\u00ebve, q\u00eb akoma nuk kemi nj\u00eb kritik\u00eb t\u00eb re n\u00eb gjendje t\u00eb p\u00ebrcjell\u00eb zhvillimet letrare. Por at\u00ebher\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsojn\u00eb ata?<\/p>\n Nuk po e v\u00eb n\u00eb dyshim nivelin e njohurive t\u00eb tyre mbi let\u00ebrsis\u00eb, por t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn legjitime p\u00ebr t\u00eb “b\u00ebr\u00eb zotin n\u00eb sht\u00ebpin\u00eb e tjetrit”. K\u00ebshtuq\u00eb, qoft\u00eb edhe vet\u00ebm nga ky fakt, vendimet e jurive paragjykohen.<\/p>\n Pastaj nuk na vjen \u00e7udi q\u00eb gjat\u00eb dh\u00ebnies s\u00eb \u00e7mimeve d\u00ebgjojm\u00eb motivime t\u00eb tilla nga m\u00eb absurdet p\u00ebr nj\u00eb \u00e7mim komb\u00ebtar, si “k\u00ebt\u00eb vit nuk do t’ua japim atyre q\u00eb tashm\u00eb jan\u00eb t\u00eb afirmuar e t\u00eb pranuar nga audienca, por atyre q\u00eb kan\u00eb qen\u00eb jasht\u00eb v\u00ebmendjes” – q\u00eb d\u00ebgjuam para kat\u00ebr vjet\u00ebsh prej kryetarit t\u00eb juris\u00eb. Ou! \u00c7far\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb kjo?<\/p>\n Cila \u00ebsht\u00eb ajo juri e cila del mbi tregun, median, vler\u00ebsimin publik, suksesin letrar? Me \u00e7’kritere u matka at\u00ebher\u00eb vlera letrare? E deri tek mungesa e transparenc\u00ebs, kur nuk p\u00ebrmenden as kandidat\u00ebt midis t\u00eb cil\u00ebve zgjidhet fituesi, nga frika e nj\u00eb “auto-goli” para opinionit publik.<\/p>\n P\u00ebr t\u00eb mos th\u00ebn\u00eb pastaj at\u00eb t\u00eb fundit fare, por jo m\u00eb pak t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme: drejtimi i jurive letrare nga njer\u00ebz t\u00eb politik\u00ebs, q\u00eb do s’do, mund t\u00eb deshifrohet si kontroll i politik\u00ebs mbi kultur\u00ebn, e papranueshme p\u00ebr nj\u00eb shtet demokratik.<\/p>\n Pra, n\u00eb vend q\u00eb \u00e7mimet letrare t\u00eb luanin nj\u00eb rol nxit\u00ebs dhe paraprir\u00ebs t\u00eb zhvillimeve letrare, n\u00eb t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt, kan\u00eb ruajtur nj\u00eb rol regresiv.<\/p>\n Si mund t’u prijn\u00eb \u00e7mimet zhvillimeve letrare?<\/strong><\/p>\n N\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri zakonisht \u00e7mimet nuk merren seriozisht dhe kthehen n\u00eb objekte batutash. Do t\u00eb ishte n\u00eb nderin e jurive n\u00eb radh\u00eb t\u00eb par\u00eb, t\u00eb ishin serioze dhe t\u00eb kthenin emocionin konkurrues tek krijuesit. Megjithat\u00eb, jemi vend i vog\u00ebl, dhe si\u00e7 e kam th\u00ebn\u00eb edhe m\u00eb par\u00eb, nj\u00eb lib\u00ebr i mir\u00eb qarkullon, diskutohet dhe kthehet n\u00eb ngjarje, pavar\u00ebsisht k\u00ebtyre mekanizmave t\u00eb cil\u00ebt duket se po konsumojn\u00eb vetveten.<\/p>\n Por, ajo q\u00eb doja t\u00eb theksoja si t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme dhe madje urgjente, \u00ebsht\u00eb orientimi i politikave kulturore drejt prodhimit letrar. Nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb rast\u00ebsi dhe as kriz\u00eb krijimtarie, fakti q\u00eb ka r\u00ebn\u00eb ndjesh\u00ebm numri i botimeve letrare. Nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb botimi apo promovimi hallka e dob\u00ebt e gjith\u00eb procesit, por \u00ebsht\u00eb prodhimi.<\/p>\n Shkrimtar\u00ebt duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrballen me problemet e mbijetes\u00ebs, nj\u00eb sfid\u00eb e p\u00ebrditshme, q\u00eb u merr krejt energjin\u00eb dhe koh\u00ebn krijuese. Kjo \u00e7\u00ebshtje n\u00eb vende t\u00eb tjera \u00ebsht\u00eb zgjidhur n\u00eb m\u00ebnyra t\u00eb ndryshme: ose ngritja e departamenteve t\u00eb shkrimit kreativ pran\u00eb universiteteve (q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb mund\u00ebsi dinjitoze pun\u00ebsimi p\u00ebr shkrimtar\u00ebt), ose fondacionet kulturore, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt ofrojn\u00eb forma konkurruese mb\u00ebshtetjeje financiare.<\/p>\n Aplikimi nga shteti i nj\u00eb programi grantesh apo bursash, qoft\u00eb edhe n\u00eb shk\u00ebmbim t\u00eb nj\u00eb lloj kontributi t\u00eb shkrimtarit n\u00eb edukimin artistik (fjala vjen), do t’i jepte atyre nj\u00eb shans q\u00eb s\u00eb paku, disa muaj n\u00eb vit t’i kushtohej let\u00ebrsis\u00eb. Dhe nuk m\u00eb duket pretendim i ekzagjeruar, kur dihet q\u00eb let\u00ebrsia ndoshta \u00ebsht\u00eb pjesa m\u00eb pak fitimprur\u00ebse e kultur\u00ebs.<\/p>\n Na trego di\u00e7ka p\u00ebr at\u00eb q\u00eb keni n\u00eb dor\u00eb, jo vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr krijimtarin\u00eb, edhe p\u00ebr studimet letrare q\u00eb po kryen n\u00eb Amerik\u00eb.<\/strong><\/p>\n Konkretisht po punoj me nj\u00eb grup poezish t\u00eb reja, shum\u00eb t\u00eb af\u00ebrt me konceptin e poemave. Libri besoj se do t\u00eb jet\u00eb gati p\u00ebr botim nga muaji shtator. Tjetra, po marr nj\u00eb program Master p\u00ebr Artet e Bukura n\u00eb SHBA, me orientim krijimtarin\u00eb letrare, q\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb gj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr ve\u00e7se nj\u00eb shkoll\u00eb p\u00ebr kritik\u00ebn letrare.<\/p>\n M\u00ebsuesit e mi jan\u00eb shkrimtar\u00eb dhe kritik\u00eb shum\u00eb t\u00eb njohur e q\u00eb shkruajn\u00eb p\u00ebr revista t\u00eb nivelit t\u00eb “New Yorker”, k\u00ebshtuq\u00eb pa dyshim q\u00eb kam se \u00e7’t\u00eb m\u00ebsoj prej tyre. \u00cbsht\u00eb nj\u00eb lloj studimi q\u00eb duhet ta kisha b\u00ebr\u00eb me koh\u00eb, por, k\u00ebto programe jan\u00eb nj\u00eb eksperienc\u00eb e re, e cila nuk aplikohet n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsi n\u00eb Europ\u00eb. Dhe lajmi m\u00eb i ri \u00ebsht\u00eb se tamam sot, m’u tha se nj\u00eb sht\u00ebpi botuese austriake ka vendosur botimin e nj\u00eb libri timin n\u00eb gjermanisht, q\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb nj\u00eb bashk\u00ebpunim tjet\u00ebr p\u00ebrkthimi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Elsa Demo, 15.02.2010 “Child of nature” \u00ebsht\u00eb libri i dyt\u00eb i Luljeta Lleshanakut q\u00eb botohet n\u00eb Amerik\u00eb. Nj\u00eb bised\u00eb p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtjet e p\u00ebrkthimit, p\u00ebrballjen n\u00eb nj\u00eb kulture tjet\u00ebr, p\u00ebr modelet njer\u00ebzor\u00eb n\u00eb poezin\u00eb e saj, p\u00ebr \u00e7mimet komb\u00ebtare t\u00eb let\u00ebrsis\u00eb dhe gjendjen ku ndodhen krijuesit shqiptar\u00eb “Child of nature” \u00ebsht\u00eb libri i dyt\u00eb poetik i […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1599","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-artikuj"},"yoast_head":"\n
\nT\u00eb dy librat e mi n\u00eb anglisht nuk jan\u00eb p\u00ebrkthyer nga nj\u00eb p\u00ebrkthyes i vet\u00ebm. N\u00eb librin e par\u00eb kan\u00eb bashk\u00ebpunuar nj\u00eb grup p\u00ebrkthyesish, (nd\u00ebr ta Uk Zenel Bu\u00e7papaj) dhe Henry Israeli.<\/p>\n
\nMegjithat\u00eb p\u00ebrkthimet jan\u00eb p\u00eblqyer deri tani.<\/p>\n
\nAjo q\u00eb kam kuptuar \u00ebsht\u00eb se botuesi amerikan k\u00ebrkon autor\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebt sjellin nj\u00eb perceptim origjinal t\u00eb bot\u00ebs.<\/p>\n